By Adam Hamilton – Re-Blogged From http://www.Gold-Eagle.com
The prevailing valuations in the lofty US stock markets are increasingly becoming a bone of contention. Wall Street calmly asserts stocks are reasonably valued, since it has a huge vested interest in keeping people fully-invested. But with valuations soaring following a massive rally and weak third-quarter earnings season, they are dangerously high and portend great downside risk. Stock topping valuations abound.
Since investing is all about buying low then selling high, the price paid for any investment is everything. Buy good companies at cheap prices, and you’ll multiply your wealth over time. But buying those very same good companies at expensive prices radically stunts future gains. While cheap investments have great potential to soar as traders recognize their inherent value, expensive ones have already exhausted their upside.
And it’s valuations, not absolute stock prices, that define cheap and expensive. Valuations are where stock prices are trading relative to their underlying corporate earnings streams. The less investors pay in terms of stock price for each dollar of profits, the greater their ultimate returns. Valuations are most often expressed in price-to-earnings-ratio terms, with stock prices divided by underlying corporate earnings per share.
This concept is so easy to understand, yet the vast majority of investors ignore it. Imagine purchasing a house for a rental property that has expected annual rental income of $30k. How much would you be willing to pay for it? If you can get it for $210k, 7x earnings, it will pay for itself in just 7 years. That’s a great deal. But if that same house is priced at $630k, 21x, it will take far too long just to recoup the initial cost.
The stock markets work the same way, with each dollar of profits completely fungible. And the US stock markets have a century-and-a-quarter average P/E ratio of 14x earnings. That’s fair value for the stock markets as a whole, paying $14 in stock price for each $1 of underlying corporate earnings. This makes a lot of sense, as stock markets exist to “lend” capital from those with surpluses of it to others running deficits.
The reciprocal of 14x earnings is 7.1%. That’s a fair rate of return for those with excess savings they want to invest, and a fair price to pay for those who want access to that scarce capital. 14x facilitates mutually-beneficial transactions for each side of the capital trade, so it’s right where stock valuations have naturally gravitated towards over the very long term. Cheap and expensive are defined from that baseline.
Half fair value, or 7x earnings, is very cheap historically. Buying good companies’ stocks trading at 7x earnings is a virtual guarantee of massive wealth-multiplying future gains. Conversely double fair value, 28x, is exceedingly-dangerous bubble territory. Buying the same good companies’ stocks at 28x dooms invested capital to many years of lackluster gains at best, and catastrophic losses exceeding 50% at worst.
There’s nothing more important for investors to understand than general-stock-market valuations. They move in great third-of-a-century cycles I call Long Valuation Waves. These are divided into secular bulls and secular bears that each last about 17 years. Valuations start out cheap near 7x, gradually expand to or through 28x in the first-half secular bulls, and then consolidate back to 7x in the second-half secular bears.
Unfortunately the US stock markets remain mired deep in the valuation-contracting secular-bear phase of their LVW today despite their epic cyclical bull of recent years. How can that be true when the US stock markets have more than tripled since early 2009? The flagship S&P 500, despite its massive gains, still remains below its real inflation-adjusted peak from the end of the last secular bull way back in March 2000!
The last cyclical bull peaked in October 2007, and ominously the US stock markets are trading at far-higher valuations today than they were back then. This first chart looks at general-stock valuations as seen through the lens of the benchmark S&P 500, or SPX. Our methodology is simple, conservative, and easy to replicate. At each month-end, we record some key data from all 500 SPX component companies.
Each individual stock price is divided by that company’s latest four quarters of accounting earnings per share as reported to the SEC, yielding individual P/E ratios for all 500 SPX components. This is classic trailing-twelve-month methodology, involving hard historical data and no guesswork on future profits. Then all 500 of these P/Es are averaged, both simply and also weighted by individual companies’ market capitalizations.
Here are the results since the topping of the last cyclical bull, with SPX valuations recently surging up to lofty nosebleed levels. Contrary to Wall Street’s endless claims that the stock markets aren’t expensive today, prevailing valuations are actually way up at dangerous bull-slaying levels. The SPX and therefore US stock markets are trading at topping valuations today, which is a super-bearish omen going forward.
While I’m eager to see November’s valuation data, this month isn’t quite over yet. So our latest SPX valuation data is from the end of October. And that proved pretty ominous, with the market-capitalization-weighted-average price-to-earnings ratio of all 500 SPX component stocks rocketing 17.5% higher on a monthly basis to 25.5x earnings! These elite companies’ simple-average P/E ratio was right in line at 25.6x.
This was a huge jump in valuations in such a short period of time, an exceedingly-rare event. It had two primary drivers. First, the mighty S&P 500 rocketed an epic 8.3% higher in October, its best month since October 2011! Assuming constant corporate profits, any stock-price gains translate directly into proportionally higher price-to-earnings ratios. Up the P/E ratio’s P by any percentage, and the P/E will match that gain.
But that only accounts for about half of October’s extreme valuation ramp. The other half came from a weak third-quarter earnings season. While there were certainly some great results from elite technology companies, the great majority of SPX components saw flat-to-weak profits year-over-year. There were mounting worries of a bifurcated economy, the tech giants thriving while most of the rest of the companies struggle.
Lowering the E in P/E naturally forces valuations higher as well. And it’s pretty amazing lower earnings actually came to pass. It’s not overall corporate profits that feed P/E ratios, but earnings per share. The great majority of elite SPX companies actively manipulate EPS higher through stock buybacks. If overall profits can be spread across fewer outstanding shares, the EPS will rise which will force valuations lower.
And thanks to the Fed’s extreme zero-interest-rate policy held in place since the dark heart of 2008’s stock panic, corporations literally borrowed trillions of dollars near artificial record-low rates to use to buy back their stocks. As of the end of Q2’15, total buybacks over that past year alone had exceeded $555b! And a whopping 3/4ths of the elite SPX companies, the biggest and best in America, bought back their stocks.
These campaigns are explicitly designed to simultaneously boost stock prices and earnings per share, which creates an illusion of growth. Companies can even mask declining earnings by buying back enough shares to more than offset the drop in profits spread across them. And this outright earnings-per-share manipulation that lowers valuations makes this past year’s valuation ramp even more ominous.
A year ago in October 2014, the elite SPX component companies had a market-capitalization-weighted-average P/E ratio of 22.8x. Weighting all components’ P/E ratios by their market caps ensures smaller companies with outsized valuations don’t disproportionately skew the overall average. And the SPX ended that year-ago October at 2018, which was actually pretty close to the 2079 closing out October 2015.
With the SPX merely climbing 3.0% in that year ending October, it’s incredible that valuations still shot up by 11.5% despite those massive stock buybacks! This implies corporate earnings have peaked this past year, which helps explain these grinding toppy stock markets. If companies fail to even maintain their profits, then today’s lofty stock-market valuations based on future earnings growth look even more threatening.
Trading at 25.5x earnings last month, the SPX was right on the cusp of exceedingly-dangerous bubble territory at 28x earnings! No valuations remotely close to this had been seen in over a decade. Even back in October 2007 when the last cyclical bull peaked, the SPX valuation was considerably lower at 21.3x earnings. Yet stocks were still expensive enough to roll over from cyclical bull to cyclical bear.
Valuations are the key arbiter of those great bull-bear cycles in the stock markets. When stocks grow expensive by historical standards late in mature bull markets, the odds mount that a new bear market looms. And investors lulled into a dangerous sense of complacency at these critical times by Wall Street’s perpetually-bullish rationalizations of why stocks should rally forever face devastating bear-market losses.
After that last cyclical bull peaked in October 2007 at merely 21x earnings, the mighty S&P 500 would plunge 56.8% over the next 1.4 years in a brutal cyclical bear. Investors owning the best-of-the-best elite American companies constituting the SPX saw their capital more than sliced in half because they failed to heed the warning of high valuations. And today’s are more extreme, nearly 20% higher than that last bull top!
Remember that for a century and a quarter, the average P/E ratio of the US stock markets has been 14x earnings. The white line in these charts reveals where the SPX would need to trade to match this historical fair-value baseline. And as of the end of October, this number is way down under 1150. With the US stock markets so expensive, the downside as these lofty valuations inevitably mean revert is massive.
The stock markets would have to drop 45% based on current corporate earnings per share, even boosted by the gargantuan ZIRP-spawned stock buybacks in recent years, to merely return to fair value! This is an interesting number, because the typical decline in cyclical stock bears following cyclical stock bulls at this stage in the market cycles is 50%. The recent stock topping valuations are very menacing indeed.
For years, Wall Street has endlessly claimed these lofty Fed-levitated stock markets are justified based on underlying corporate-earnings fundamentals. For years, Wall Street has applauded the manipulative stock buybacks that artificially boost earnings per share. All this has led to extreme complacency, with most investors convinced this long-in-the-tooth bull market can continue indefinitely. Boy will they be surprised.
And even worse, the downside target for the next S&P 500 bear is actually much lower than fair value. At this stage in those great Long Valuation Wave stock-market cycles, valuations actually ought to be much closer to 10x earnings. This next chart, which zooms out to encompass the entire secular bear since 2000, illuminates this enormous downside risk created by the Fed’s brazen artificial stock-market levitation.
The US stock markets remain mired deep in the same secular bear that started back in March 2000. How can that be when the S&P 500 peaked at 1527 back then and recently soared to 2131 in May 2015? If the March 2000 apex of the last secular bull is adjusted for US Consumer Price Index inflation, which is even lowballed for political reasons, it works out to 2122 in constant May 2015 dollars. That’s a staggering revelation.
For 15.2 years, the US stock markets did nothing but grind sideways at best in real terms! For all the sound and fury of the Fed’s extraordinary stock-market levitation of recent years fueled by its unprecedented third quantitative-easing campaign, all it accomplished was returning the stock markets to their last real secular-bull peak. But not even the Fed’s epic money printing could create a solid corporate-profits foundation.
October’s near-bubble 25.5x SPX valuations were last seen 11.3 years earlier in June 2004. And those were right on the major secular-bear stock-valuation downtrend shown above with the thick blue dotted line. That valuation downtrend is exceedingly important, and actual valuations oscillated around it as usual in secular bears until late 2012 when the Fed launched and expanded its infamous QE3 campaign.
QE3 was radically different from QE1 and QE2 because it was open-ended, it had no predetermined size or end date like its predecessors. Top Fed officials deftly used this ambiguity to manipulate psychology among stock traders. They continually implied the Fed was ready to increase the size of QE3’s debt monetizations if the stock markets suffered any material selloff. The Fed was jawboning stocks higher.
Stock traders interpreted this endless dovishness exactly as the Fed intended, believing an effective Fed Put was in place for the stock markets. So they rushed to aggressively buy already-high stocks, ignoring all conventional indicators of risk including valuations. That Fed-sparked stampede into stocks fueled the massive breakout of the SPX above its 13-year-old nominal resistance near 1500 back in early 2013.
As the stock-market valuations rising sharply in the Fed-SPX-levitation era since 2013 prove, the huge stock gains weren’t the result of improving earnings fundamentals but merely Fed hot air. With profits failing to grow enough to justify those lofty stock prices, the fundamental foundation of recent years’ powerful stock bull was totally rotten. Stock valuations were driven to near-bubble extreme topping territory.
And with the Fed’s easy-money policies that inflated the stock markets ending, the chickens are going to come home to roost. The Fed concluded its new quantitative-easing bond buying with money conjured out of thin air in October 2014, and it seems to be on the verge of ending its zero-interest-rate policy kept in place since December 2008 that fueled those epic corporate stock buybacks seen in recent years.
And with the vast bullish psychological impact of QE and ZIRP fading, stock-market valuations are going to mean revert back to their secular downtrend in place before the Fed goosed the stock markets. The whole purpose of secular stock bears is to force the markets to grind sideways for long enough to give corporate earnings time to grow into the extreme stock prices seen at the end of the preceding secular bull.
This massive 17-year secular-bear grind is accomplished through smaller cyclical bears and bulls within that span. Secular bears consist of a series of cyclical bears that first cut stock prices in half, followed by cyclical bulls that double them back up to breakeven again. Since 2000, we’ve seen two of these full cyclical-bull-bear cycles. And as today’s dangerous stock-topping valuations prove, the next bear is imminent.
Thanks to the Fed’s gross market distortions in recent years dragging stocks so far outside of normal trends, this next bear is going to be a doozy. Secular bears begin with stock valuations near or above bubble levels, and end with them around half fair value at 7x earnings before the next secular bull can be born. At this late stage in 17-year secular bears as the valuation downtrend shows, P/Es should be near 10x.
Based on current corporate earnings, which Wall Street constantly claims are excellent, the SPX would have to plunge over 60% from here to 820! Even if profits start miraculously growing in this tough world economy, it’s hard to imagine them rising enough in the next couple years to push the SPX much over 1000 at 10x earnings. The Fed’s artificial stock-market levitation that so stretched valuations will prove disastrous.