New Batteries Use “Rust” for Power Storage

By Anthony Watts – Re-Blogged From http://www.WattsUpWithThat.com

Renaissance of the Iron–Air Battery

Jülich researchers show charging and discharging reactions during operation with nanometre precision

Jülich, 3 November 2017 – Iron–air batteries promise a considerably higher energy density than present-day lithium-ion batteries. In addition, their main constituent – iron – is an abundant and therefore cheap material. Scientists from Forschungszentrum Jülich are among the driving forces in the renewed research into this concept, which was discovered in the 1970s. Together with American Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), they successfully observed with nanometre precision how deposits form at the iron electrode during operation. A deeper understanding of the charging and discharging reactions is viewed as the key for the further development of this type of rechargeable battery to market maturity. The results were published in the renowned journal Nano Energy.

For reasons including insurmountable technical difficulties, research into metal–air batteries was abandoned in the 1980s for a long time. The past few years, however, have seen a rapid increase in research interest. Iron–air batteries draw their energy from a reaction of iron with oxygen. In this process, the iron oxidizes almost exactly as it would during the rusting process. The oxygen required for the reaction can be drawn from the surrounding air so that it does not need to be stored in the battery. These material savings are the reason for the high energy densities achieved by metal–air batteries.

2017-11-03-iron-air-battery-01

Gravimetric and volumetric energy densities of various metal–air battery systems in comparison with Li-ion batteries and conventional gasoline  Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich / H. Weinrich

Iron–air batteries are predicted to have theoretical energy densities of more than 1,200 Wh/kg. By comparison, present-day lithium-ion batteries come in at about 600 Wh/kg, and even less (350 Wh/kg) if the weight of the cell casing is taken into account. Lithium–air batteries, which are technically considerably more difficult and complicated to realize, can have energy densities of up to 11,400 Wh/kg. When it comes to volumetric energy density, iron–air batteries perform even better: at 9,700 Wh/l, it is almost five times as high as that of today’s lithium-ion batteries (2,000 Wh/l). Even lithium–air batteries have “only” 6,000 Wh/l. Iron–air batteries are thus particularly interesting for a multitude of mobile applications in which space requirements play a large role.

“We consciously concentrate on research into battery types made of materials that are abundant in the Earth’s crust and produced in large quantities,” explains institute head Prof. Rüdiger-A. Eichel. “Supply shortages are thus not to be expected. The concept is also associated with a cost advantage, which can be directly applied to the battery, particularly for large-scale applications such as stationary devices for the stabilization of the electricity grid or electromobility.”

Difficult conditions for analysis

The insights obtained by the Jülich researchers create a new basis for improving the properties of the battery in a targeted manner. Using in situ electrochemical atomic force microscopes at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, they were able to observe how deposits of iron hydroxide particles (Fe(OH)2) form at the iron electrode under conditions similar to those prevalent during charging and discharging.

2017-11-03-iron-air-battery-02

Changes to the electrode surface over the course of four charging/discharging (redox) cycles Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich / H. Weinrich


“The high pH of 13.7 alone represents a borderline condition for the instrument,” explains Henning Weinrich from Jülich’s Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-9). “We were the first at Oak Ridge to successfully conduct such an experiment under realistic conditions,” says Weinrich, who stayed in the USA for three months especially for the measurements.

Deposits increase capacity

The deposits do not decrease the power of the battery. On the contrary, since the nanoporous layer increases the active surface area of the electrode, it contributes to a small increase in capacity after each charging and discharging cycle. Thanks to the investigations, the researchers have for the first time obtained a complete picture of this layer growth. “It was previously assumed that the deposition is reversed during charging. But this is obviously not the case,” explains Dr. Hermann Tempel from Jülich’s Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-9). Furthermore, a direct link was verified for the first time between the layer formation at the electrode surface and the electrochemical reactions.

There is, however, still a long way to go until market maturity. Although isolated electrodes made of iron can be operated without major power losses for several thousand cycles in laboratory experiments, complete iron–air batteries, which use an air electrode as the opposite pole, have only lasted 20 to 30 cycles so far.

2017-11-03-iron-air-battery-03

Schematic of the measuring method: the tip of the in situ electrochemical atomic force microscope scans the surface of the iron electrode. Laser-beam deflection reveals spatial irregularities, which can be compared to each other over the course of several cycles.  Copyright: Forschungszentrum Jülich / H. Weinrich

Original publication:

Understanding the nanoscale redox-behavior of iron-anodes for rechargeable iron-air batteries Henning Weinrich, Jérémy Come, Hermann Tempel, Hans Kungl, Rüdiger-A. Eichel, Nina Balke Nano Energy 41 (available online 10 October 2017), DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.023

CONTINUE READING –>

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s