Rise and Fall of Central England Temperatures

By Tony Brown – Re-Blogged From http://www.WattsUpWithThat.com

[The many good charts did not transfer in pasting. Please use the link at bottom to see them. -Bob]

This article examines the continued cooling of CET this century

  • Looks at a similar scenario of regional cooling in America
  • Examines CET related urbanisation issues, and the current Met office allowances for this
  • Notes the centuries long general warming of our climate.
  • Notes considerable English seasonal variability over the centuries
  • Examines the key component parts of the weather that affect the British Isles
  • Queries whether wind direction, strength and longevity are major factors in shaping our climate over the centuries.

Note: Weather comprises the day to day events that we all experience. Climate is officially the trend of the weather (often temperature and rainfall) taken over a continuous thirty year period. The two terms have sometimes been used in an interchangeable manner here, when a period of more than a year is being examined.

Some two years ago I wrote this article The Rise and Fall of Central England Temperature. This article commented on the interesting-but not climatically valid-observation that no one born in England this century has known warming; in fact there had been a slight decline in temperatures, albeit still maintained at a historically high level.

This data – using Central England Temperature (CET) which is maintained by the Met Office – has now been updated to the end of 2017 as shown in Figure 1. It shows this decline continuing, although recent warm seasons have slightly reduced the downwards trendI’m pleased to announce that with a new WordPress.com upgrade now available, sharing of WUWT posts is now much easier. I’d like to ask WUWT readers to take a moment to familiarize themselves with this new feature. Using it will help get the word out, along with increasing WUWT’s traffic and web rankings.

Readers may notice this new toolbar at the bottom of each WUWT post now:

You’ll now be able to click on these icons and post/share WUWT content elsewhere. I can add some some additional sharing services, provided they offer a sharing format. Suggestions welcome.

Also, please note that I encourage the posting of WUWT links to support your narrative in comments elsewhere, even if they get deleted.

Please make use of these new features whenever you can to support WUWT.

Please note that many of the other suggestions made to WUWT aren’t going unnoticed, but they are mostly out of my control. WUWT uses the wordpress.com hosting service, and features are generally under their control. For example I regularly ask wordpress support to add a comment preview feature. Hopefully someday they will.

Given the traffic that WUWT gets, a single server box like Lucia runs just isn’t practical. Regular readers may recall that Climate Audit was hosted on a single box server, which was upgraded and improved, and then when climategate hit in November 2009, CA went down due to the crushing load. WUWT stayed operational and thrived, thanks to the wordpress.com distributed computing system.

Hence while I could move WUWT to a private server and get more custom features that readers have been asking for, the broadcaster in me says “the transmitter is the weakest link, make sure it is the best”.

========================================

From pingdom:

The people behind the WordPress.com blogging service recently shared some technical information about their new data center in Chicago, which is located in a Layered Technologies facility.

WordPress.com hosts about 5.5 million blogs on its platform, and is not to be confused with the stand-alone WordPress software (which you find at WordPress.org and host yourself).

Here is the server hardware powering the latest WordPress.com data center:

  • 150 HP DL165s dual quad-core AMD 2354 processors 2GB-4GB RAM
  • 50 HP DL365s dual dual-core AMD 2218 processors 4GB-16GB RAM
  • 5 HP DL185s dual quad-core AMD 2354 processors 4GB RAM

That’s a total of 1,440 CPU cores and somewhere between 520 GB and 1.4 TB of RAM. In other words, a significant amount of computing power…

This is one of three data centers that power WordPress.com.

More information, including a (somewhat shaky) video of the wordpress.com server facility is available here.

========================================

I figure with the wordpress.com as my “transmitter”, I really can’t go wrong.

Thanks for your consideration – Anthony

” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-23881″ src=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide01.png?w=500&h=375″ alt=”” srcset=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide01.png?w=500&h=375&zoom=2 1.5x” scale=”1.5″ width=”500″ height=”375″>Figure 1To put this into a much broader context, here is the seasonal data from the start of the CET record in 1660.

I’m pleased to announce that with a new WordPress.com upgrade now available, sharing of WUWT posts is now much easier. I’d like to ask WUWT readers to take a moment to familiarize themselves with this new feature. Using it will help get the word out, along with increasing WUWT’s traffic and web rankings.

Readers may notice this new toolbar at the bottom of each WUWT post now:

You’ll now be able to click on these icons and post/share WUWT content elsewhere. I can add some some additional sharing services, provided they offer a sharing format. Suggestions welcome.

Also, please note that I encourage the posting of WUWT links to support your narrative in comments elsewhere, even if they get deleted.

Please make use of these new features whenever you can to support WUWT.

Please note that many of the other suggestions made to WUWT aren’t going unnoticed, but they are mostly out of my control. WUWT uses the wordpress.com hosting service, and features are generally under their control. For example I regularly ask wordpress support to add a comment preview feature. Hopefully someday they will.

Given the traffic that WUWT has seen, a single server box like Lucia runs just isn’t practical. Regular readers may recall that Climate Audit was hosted on a single box server, which was upgraded and improved, and then when climategate hit in November 2009, CA went down due to the crushing load. WUWT stayed operational and thrived, thanks to the wordpress.com distributed computing system.

Hence while I could move WUWT to a private server and get more custom features that readers have been asking for, the broadcaster in me says “the transmitter is the weakest link, make sure it is the best”.

========================================

From pingdom:

The people behind the WordPress.com blogging service recently shared some technical information about their new data center in Chicago, which is located in a Layered Technologies facility.

WordPress.com hosts about 5.5 million blogs on its platform, and is not to be confused with the stand-alone WordPress software (which you find at WordPress.org and host yourself).

Here is the server hardware powering the latest WordPress.com data center:

  • 150 HP DL165s dual quad-core AMD 2354 processors 2GB-4GB RAM
  • 50 HP DL365s dual dual-core AMD 2218 processors 4GB-16GB RAM
  • 5 HP DL185s dual quad-core AMD 2354 processors 4GB RAM

That’s a total of 1,440 CPU cores and somewhere between 520 GB and 1.4 TB of RAM. In other words, a significant amount of computing power…

This is one of three data centers that power WordPress.com.

More information, including a (somewhat shaky) video of the wordpress.com server facility is available here.

========================================

I figure with the wordpress.com as my “transmitter”, I really can’t go wrong.

Thanks for your consideration – Anthony

” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-23882″ src=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide02.png?w=500&h=375″ alt=”” srcset=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide02.png?w=500&h=375&zoom=2 1.5x” scale=”1.5″ width=”500″ height=”375″>Figure 2Figure 2a linked here [2a ], shows the seasonal temperatures in much greater detail.

The recent cooling was interesting, as it appeared that CET fitted into the pattern of an earlier article I co-authored with Verity Jones In Search of Cooling Trends.

This graphic shows some of the stations identified as cooling over the statistically meaningful period of at least 30 years

A UN board could rein in $2.7 billion carbon market to prevent the double dipping of CFC manufacturing incentives and carbon credit sales, as discovered to be happening in China.

Guest post by Ric Werme

Excerpts from: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100821/ap_on_bi_ge/un_un_carbon_cutting_scheme# reports

UNITED NATIONS – An obscure U.N. board that oversees a $2.7 billion market intended to cut heat-trapping gases has agreed to take steps that could lead to it eventually reining in what European and U.S. environmentalists are calling a huge scam.

At a meeting this week that ended Friday, the executive board of the U.N.’s Clean Development Mechanism said that five chemical plants in China would no longer qualify for funding as so-called carbon offset credits until the environmentalists’ claims can be further investigated.

This is coupled with the production of the “ozone friendly” refrigerant HCFC-22 (chlorodifluoromethane). A byproduct of production is another gas, HFC-23 (trifluoromethane) which has been determined to be 11,700 times more powerful than CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

Not only are the manufacturers able to sell carbon credits for producing HCFC-22, they can also sell “certified emission reductions” (CERs) for destroying HFC-23, to the tune of about $100,000 per ton! 

Not surprisingly:

“The evidence is overwhelming that manufacturers are creating excess HFC-23 simply to destroy it and earn carbon credits,” said Mark Roberts of the Environmental Investigation Agency, a research and advocacy group. “This is the biggest environmental scandal in history and makes an absolute mockery of international efforts to combat climate change.

This is not a new problem. While looking for a decent image, I came across the 2007 article http://www.carbon-financeonline.com/index.cfm?section=features&action=view&id=10420 which notes:

The creation of carbon credits from the destruction of the potent greenhouse gas (GHG) trifluoromethane (HFC23) has been one of the most controversial issues during the early life of the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).

A by-product of the manufacture of the refrigerant HCFC22, many viewed HFC23 destruction projects as a cheap money-maker for a small number of industrial sites in a handful of developing countries that provided little discernible sustainable development benefit to those countries.

With CERs currently selling for €11 ($14)/t, the profit margins from HFC23 destruction projects are obvious. For example, Indian chemicals firm SRF, which operates one of the 10 registered HFC23 destruction projects, said in a recently released earnings report that it has, so far, sold 3.65 million CERs in the 2006-07 financial year for Rs4,050 million ($96 million). The sale of CERs has become a significant revenue stream for the company, second only to its technical textiles business and ahead of its chemicals and packaging units.

Current state-of-the-art production facilities, such as DuPont’s Louisville Works in the US, have HFC23 generation rates as low as 1.37%, so there may be some scope for the volume of CERs from new production, if allowed, to be considerably less than from existing plants.

DuPont is not involved in HFC23 destruction in the CDM market. But it has destroyed HFC23 as part of a set of 1991 internal goals to reduce GHG emissions. “We were doing this way before the carbon market,” says Mack McFarland, an environmental fellow with DuPont Fluoroproducts in Wilmington, Delaware.

That article has a graphic…

""

…that shows HFCs as half the CDM market in the first 3 quarters of 2006.

In 2008, http://blueskieschina.com/mambo/content/view/257/90/ noted

While China has long been ahead of India in terms of potential carbon credits generated by registered projects, India has dominated actual CER issue since January 2006.

But a bumper start to 2008 for China saw over 10 million CERs issued in January, accounting for over 90% of all CERs issued that month (chart 2). These credits, stemming from just four chemical plant HFC23 destruction projects, pushed China into first place in the issued carbon credit leaderboard for the first time since the CDM programme began.

There’s a lot more background at http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Clean_Development_Mechanism_and_HFC-23_destruction

I guess it’s too late to invest in new HCFC-22 chemical plants.

” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-23883″ src=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide03.png?w=500&h=375″ alt=”” srcset=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide03.png?w=500&h=375&zoom=2 1.5x” scale=”1.5″ width=”500″ height=”375″>Figure 3The take home message was that whilst undoubtedly most stations around the world had warmed in recent decades, it could be observed that there were large warming AND cooling trends in many places. With regards to cooling, some one third of stations worldwide showed a trend that was downwards, rather than upwards. This was confirmed by Richard Muller of the BEST project several years ago in a personal email, but it must be said there are many caveats to this observation, especially as regards the length, amount and consistency of this cooling.

In 2016 Professor Muller wrote an article in which he observed the areas of sustained cooling in America;

Postings are moderated, I and the volunteer moderators try to keep up, but on occasion there may be delays of a few hours. There are three other volunteer moderators, but even so there may be some overnight gaps.

</li>
<li>

No vulgarities of any kind, nor links to sites that promote such. Particularly porn or gaming sites.

</li>
<li>No links to commercial websites that are not relevant to the discussion.</li>
<li>

Respect is given to those with manners, those without manners that insult others or begin starting flame wars may find their posts deleted.

</li>
<li>

Some off topic comments may get deleted, don’t take it personally, it happens. Commenters that routinely lead threads astray in areas that are not relevant or are of personal interest only to them may find these posts deleted.

</li>
<li>

A spam filter is employed; some posts may disappear into it based on words, phrases, and/or links. If you feel you have been accidentally blocked, try posting a single one or two sentence comment to alert me and I’ll see if I can recover it for you.

</li>
<li>

Trolls, flame-bait, personal attacks, use of “denialist,” “denier” and other detritus that add nothing to further the discussion may get deleted, take that personally if you wish, but all deletions are final. Grousing about it won’t help since deleted posts can’t be recovered. Rather than trying to edit, bulk moderation may be employed to save time.

</li>
<li>

I have several projects I work on plus a business to run, if moderation takes too much time and becomes redundant, I may opt to remove posts and/or shut down a thread.

</li>
<li>

Internet phantoms who have cryptic handles, no name, and no real email address get no respect here. If you think your opinion or idea is important, elevate your status by being open and honest. People that use their real name get more respect than phantoms with handles. I encourage open discussion.

</li>
<li>Anonymity is not guaranteed on this blog. Posters that use a government or publicly funded ip address that assume false identities for the purpose of hiding their source of opinion while on the taxpayers dime get preferential treatment for full disclosure.</li>
<li>A real working email address that you own (as a commenter) is required, so that I may contact you if needed. False or misleading email addresses may earn banishment. Changing handles and/or changing email addresses to get around this will also earn the same fate.</li>
<li>

You are responsible for your own words.

</li>
<li>

Stories that have been posted may get edited in the first hour after they first appear. This is because WordPress.com does not have a good preview function. Sometimes errors or mistakes (particularly in formatting) aren’t seen until the post is published. If something doesn’t look right and the post is brand-new, try refreshing in a few minutes. Of course, after an hour if something is still wrong, don’t hesitate to leave a comment to point it out.

</li>
<li>The idea of the blog is to learn, discuss, and enjoy the interaction. Please try to keep that in mind when making comments.</li>
<li>Certain topics are not welcome here and comments concerning them will be deleted. This includes topics on religion, discussions of barycentrism, astrology, and topics not directly related to the thread. A Tips and notes sections exists for  bringing items of interest to attention.</li>
<li>

I reserve the right to modify the policy as needed, including on an event basis.

</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks for visiting, and please enjoy your stay! – Anthony</p>
<h6>Last updated Nov 11th, 2009</h6>
<p>For further info on Blog Etiquette, see this from PC Advisor:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=9550">http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=9550</a></p>
” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” />

Figure 4

He wrote [link]

I attach a plot that shows climate around the US. The blue circles show locations where the trend line has indicated cooling weather over the last 100 years. The red crosses show where it has warmed. The fact that ⅔ of the spots are warming illustrates that global warming is real, although to be careful and scientific we have to avoid the heat island effects (not part of global warming) and average equally over all land and sea. The cooling parts on the map don’t indicate that the world is cooling, but only that local variability in climate is still larger than the global warming trend.

Now neither America nor England constitutes the entire world land surface of course, but both countries have especially good weather records. In Britain’s case, the temperature records go back to 1659, which I reconstructed further back to 1538 in this article from 2011 The Long Slow Thaw.

This showed the oscillation of temperatures throughout the period and in particular the depths of cold in the ‘Little Ice Age.’ (The results can be seen in Figure 6, below.)

The keepers of the CET records-the UK Met office  had recognised that since its inception over 350 years ago, Britain – and more specifically England – had become much more urbanised and accordingly made adjustments to the temperatures in recent decades to compensate. In the ‘Long Slow Thaw’ I wrote this:

The modern era of CET is potentially showing the effects of needing a uhi adjustment greater than the Met office currently apply. * However, as we had earlier observed that instrumental records should not be considered accurate to tenths of a degree we are perhaps splitting hairs. Consequently, more accurately we should observe that the ‘direction of travel’ of temperatures, when combined and constrained by historic records, shows that at several points from 1538 there are similarities to the modern era as regards warm periods.

*Note; Since 1974 the data have been adjusted by the Met Office to allow for urban warming: currently a correction of -0.2 °C is applied to mean temperatures. The context of this UHI adjustment can be seen in this graphic showing population growth.

""For those who don’t know, William Connolley, a Real Climate founding contributor, has been the most prolific climate information gatekeeper at Wikipedia, and was the subject of this Lawrence Solomon article:

Wikibullies at work. The National Post exposes broad trust issues over Wikipedia climate information

Given the volume of his volunteer Wiki output, one wonders how he supports himself with regular work.

Bishop hill reports today:

A correspondent writes to tell me that Wikipedia’s Arbitration Committee are currently examining the conduct of people involved in the ongoing saga of edit wars over climate change articles. 

The allegations and counter-allegations over who did what and when can be seen here.

There has now been a draft decision issued and it looks as though, hot on the heels of losing his SysOp privileges, Dr Connolley may be up for a ban. He will be accompanied by at least one sceptic.

(As always with Wiki, please don’t get involved if you are not already)

A look at the list of grievances  is interesting, note that Lawrence Solomon’s page is in an edit war.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate_change/Proposed_decision

Edit warring on Climate Change related articles

6) During the course of this arbitration case, the following articles required full page protection due to edit warring. [3]

Four of the six articles involved in the eight edit wars are biographies of living people. Almost 30 editors were involved in the eight edit wars that resulted in these page protections; two of these editors, William M. Connolley and Marknutley, were involved in seven of eight edit wars.

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

William M. Connolley previously sanctioned and desysopped

7) In the Abd-William M. Connolley arbitration case (July-September 2009), William M. Connolley was found to have misused his admin tools while involved. As a result, he lost administrator permissions, and was admonished and prohibited from interacting with User:Abd. Prior to that, he was sanctioned in Requests for arbitration/Climate change dispute (2005, revert parole) and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Geogre-William M. Connolley (2008, restricted from administrative actions relating to Giano II). He was also the subject of RFC’s regarding his conduct: RfC 1 (2005) and RfC 2 (2008).

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

William M. Connolley has been uncivil and antagonistic

8) William M. Connolley has been uncivil and antagonistic to editors within the topic area, and toward administrators enforcing the community probation. (Selection of representative examples: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17])

This uncivil and antagonistic behaviour has included refactoring of talk page comments by other users,(examples: [18],[[19]]) to the point that he was formally prohibited from doing so. In the notice advising him that a consensus of 7 administrators had prohibited his refactoring of talk page posts, he inserted commentary within the post of the administrator leaving the notice on his talk page. [20]] For this action, he was blocked for 48 hours; had the block extended to 4 days with talk page editing disabled due to continuing insertions into the posts of other users on his talk page; had his block reset to the original conditions; then was blocked indefinitely with talk page editing disabled when he again inserted comments into the posts of others on his talk page.[21] After extensive discussion at Administrator noticeboard/Incidents, the interpretation of consensus was that the Climate Change general sanctions did not extend to the actions of editors on their own talk pages, and the block was lifted.

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

William M. Connolley has shown Ownership

9) William M. Connolley is acknowledged to have expertise on the topic of climate change significantly beyond that of most Wikipedians; however, this also holds true for several other editors who regularly edit in this topic area. In this setting, User:William M. Connolley has shown an unreasonable degree of Ownership over climate-related articles and unwillingness to work in a consensus environment. (Selection of representative examples: [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31])

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

William M. Connolley BLP violations

10) William M. Connolley has repeatedly violated the biography of living persons policy. Violations have included inserting personal information irrelevant to the subject’s notability, use of blogs as sources, inserting original research and opinion into articles, and removing reliably sourced positive comments about subjects. He has edited biographical articles of persons with whom he has off-wiki professional or personal disagreements. (Selection of representative examples: [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40])

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

================================================================

The list of solutions that Wiki members can vote on don’t bode well for Mr. Connelley

William M. Connolley banned

3.1) User:William M. Connolley is banned from the English Wikipedia for six months for long-term violations of WP:OWN, WP:CIVIL, and WP:BLP.

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:
Comment:
(Please note that some of the remedy proposals here are alternatives.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

William M. Connolley topic-banned (Climate Change)

3.2) User:William M. Connolley is banned from all Climate Change articles, broadly construed, for one year. He may edit their talk pages. This editing restriction specifically includes modification of talk page edits made by any other user, on any talk page; in the case of posts to William M. Connolley’s user talk page, he is free to remove posts without response.

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

William M. Connolley topic-banned (BLP)

4) User:William M. Connolley is banned from editing any article that is substantially the biography of a living person, where the person’s notability or the subject of the edit relates to the topic area of global warming or climate change.

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

William M. Connolley restricted

5) User:William M. Connolley is subject to an editing restriction for one year. Should he make any edits which are judged by an uninvolved administrator to be uncivil remarks, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, or violations of WP:BLP, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 3 blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one month. This editing restriction specifically includes modification of talk page edits made by any other user, on any talk page; in the case of posts to William M. Connolley’s user talk page, he is free to remove posts without response.

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

h/t to WUWT reader Stephan

” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-23885″ src=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide05.png?w=500&h=375&#8243; alt=”” srcset=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide05.png?w=500&h=375&zoom=2 1.5x” scale=”1.5″ width=”500″ height=”375″>

Figure 5

The same data is shown below, excluding the population data which somewhat distorts the axis of the graphs

From the “no headlines for you!” department, Danielle loses definition. It goes from TS to Hurricane Cat1, Cat2, and back to TS in less than 24 hours…see the image below of Danielle in the lower right:

Latest bulletin from NHC:

000
WTNT31 KNHC 242040
TCPAT1
BULLETIN
TROPICAL STORM DANIELLE ADVISORY NUMBER  13
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL     AL062010
500 PM AST TUE AUG 24 2010

...DANIELLE WEAKENS TO A TROPICAL STORM...EXPECTED TO BE
TEMPORARY...


SUMMARY OF 500 PM AST...2100 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...17.5N 48.2W
ABOUT 895 MI...1445 KM E OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...70 MPH...110 KM/HR
PRESENT MOVEMENT...WNW OR 295 DEGREES AT 18 MPH...30 KM/HR
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...993 MB...29.32 INCHES


WATCHES AND WARNINGS
--------------------
THERE ARE NO COASTAL WATCHES OR WARNINGS IN EFFECT.


DISCUSSION AND 48-HOUR OUTLOOK
------------------------------
AT 500 PM AST...2100 UTC...THE CENTER OF TROPICAL STORM DANIELLE WAS
LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 17.5 NORTH...LONGITUDE 48.2 WEST.  DANIELLE IS
MOVING TOWARD THE WEST-NORTHWEST NEAR 18 MPH...30 KM/HR...BUT IS
EXPECTED TO SLOW DOWN AND TURN TOWARD THE NORTHWEST DURING THE NEXT
COUPLE OF DAYS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS HAVE DECREASED TO NEAR 70 MPH...110
KM/HR...WITH HIGHER GUSTS.  ALTHOUGH DANIELLE HAS WEAKENED TO A
TROPICAL STORM...RE-STRENGTHENING IS FORECAST DURING THE NEXT 48
HOURS...AND IT COULD BECOME A HURRICANE AGAIN LATER TONIGHT OR ON
WEDNESDAY.

TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 140 MILES...220 KM
FROM THE CENTER.

ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 993 MB...29.32 INCHES.


HAZARDS AFFECTING LAND
----------------------
NONE.

” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-23886″ src=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide06.png?w=500&h=375&#8243; alt=”” srcset=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide06.png?w=500&h=375&zoom=2 1.5x” scale=”1.5″ width=”500″ height=”375″>

Figure 6

In considering the urbanisation factor used, it can be noted that the current population of Greater London is the same as that of the whole of England 200 years ago. The population has increased some 25% since the UHI adjustment was first made in 1974. Some 60% of the population of England lives within an hours’ drive of the Peak district which can be considered the area CET is centred on. One of the stations used in recent times, Ringway, was situated near a rapidly expanding airport. It was retired in 2004. England at 130,000sq km and a population of 55 million, is less than the size of New York state at 141,000sq km with a population of 20 million. So England, with its small size and large population could be considered one large heat island with the CET stations in the middle of it.

In consequence there appears to be a reasonable possibility that a further adjustment needs to be made to the urbanisation factor, which might slightly affect that characteristic ‘hump’ from 1990 clearly seen in Figure 6. In recent emails with the Met office I understand that during 2017 they carried out some work with regards to re-evaluating the CET daily and monthly series and current urbanisation adjustments have been revisited.

The result is that a new version of CET with supporting documentation is currently being formulated. Any differentiation with the existing series will need to be scientifically justified. Making any adjustments to the world’s longest running temperature series is not undertaken lightly, so it is unlikely we will see the results of this investigation in the near future. The immense amount of scientific analysis that goes into making adjustments to the record can be seen in this 2005 paper written by Met Office authors [link].

So it may end up that the urbanisation corrections could be larger for more recent years, but to comment on the likely adjustments, if any, would be mere speculation at this point.

Setting that issue aside for the time being, we can extract a variety of other data from an analysis of the seasons.

Figure 7

The coloured dots in Figure 7 highlight those ‘exceptional seasons’ that are at least 1.5C warmer or colder than the 5 year moving average. With a rising trend virtually from the start of both the official and extended record, fewer seasons would be counted as exceptional at the end, than at the start, of the graphic. However, that early era was said to be amongst the coldest periods in the Holocene- and should not be considered ‘normal’.

It was from around 1550 that some of the most severe periods of the LIA, with considerable glacier growth, appear to have occurred. This is illustrated in Figure 8 whose data was derived from a variety of sources including ‘Times of Feast, Times of Famine’ by E Roy Ladurie. Onto it has been superimposed extended CET. As can be seen from this graphic and the data noted in the other graphics, glacier growth or retreat does not necessarily occur only during short and sporadic periods of constant cold or warmth, but from the dominant weather characteristics of the entire period.Figure 8

Looking again at Figure 7, what is notable is that even in the cold early period there were many mild winters. CET has a relatively small temperature spread with the greatest differences generally occurring in winter and summer and it can be readily seen that a mild winter can distort the year’s average. This most recently happened in 2015 when a fairly cool year up to then was changed by one of the warmest Decembers on record. Similarly a cold season, especially a winter, can cool down the year. If there are two or more exceptional seasons in the same year that will have a considerable impact on the average temperature of that year.

It is highly unusual for three or more seasons in one year to exceed these ‘exceptional’ temperatures, when they do, it is invariably marked by an exceptionally warm or cold year.

In Figure 9 (below) I examined the data covering the period 1538 onwards, with a particular view to looking closely at the especially cold periods. The rather vague term ‘Little Ice Age’ is something of a misnomer and is often generally applied to the exceptional cold that was thought to have lasted from around 1250 to well into the 19th century. The period around Dickens birth, his evocation of devastatingly cold winters, together with Napoleons retreat from Moscow, beaten by ‘General Winter’ are high profile examples of the latter part of this extended cold period. However, that is not the whole picture, as there were surprising interludes of considerable warmth throughout the ‘LIA’ as I noted in this article on The Intermittent Little Ice Age.

Figure 9 that follows is taken from this article.

But just barely…see Danielle in lower right of image

Latest news:

WTNT31 KNHC 250256
TCPAT1
BULLETIN
HURRICANE DANIELLE ADVISORY NUMBER  14
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL     AL062010
1100 PM AST TUE AUG 24 2010

…DANIELLE A HURRICANE AGAIN…

SUMMARY OF 1100 PM AST…0300 UTC…INFORMATION
———————————————–
LOCATION…18.2N 49.8W
ABOUT 795 MI…1275 KM E OF THE LEEWARD ISLANDS
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS…75 MPH…120 KM/HR
PRESENT MOVEMENT…WNW OR 295 DEGREES AT 18 MPH…30 KM/HR
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE…990 MB…29.23 INCHES

WATCHES AND WARNINGS
——————–
THERE ARE NO COASTAL WATCHES OR WARNINGS IN EFFECT.

DISCUSSION AND 48-HOUR OUTLOOK
——————————
AT 1100 PM AST…0300 UTC…THE CENTER OF HURRICANE DANIELLE WAS
LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 18.2 NORTH…LONGITUDE 49.8 WEST. DANIELLE IS
MOVING TOWARD THE WEST-NORTHWEST NEAR 18 MPH…30 KM/HR…BUT IS
EXPECTED TO SLOW DOWN AND TURN TOWARD THE NORTHWEST DURING THE NEXT
COUPLE OF DAYS.

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS HAVE INCREASED TO NEAR 75 MPH…120
KM/HR…WITH HIGHER GUSTS.  DANIELLE IS A CATEGORY ONE HURRICANE ON
THE SAFFIR-SIMPSON HURRICANE WIND SCALE.  LITTLE CHANGE IN STRENGTH
IS EXPECTED TOMORROW…WITH SOME STRENGTHENING POSSIBLE BY
THURSDAY.

HURRICANE FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 30 MILES…45 KM…FROM
THE CENTER…AND TROPICAL STORM FORCE WINDS EXTEND OUTWARD UP TO 140
MILES…220 KM.

THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE IS 990 MB…29.23 INCHES.

HAZARDS AFFECTING LAND
———————-
NONE.

Dr. Ryan Maue formerly of FSU, and Dr. Robert Hart, Professor of Meteorology at FSU maintain websites with various model graphics that allow the average meteorologist see some of what the professionals at the National Hurricane Center use to issue their long-range forecasts for Danielle — and her soon-to-be friends in her wake…

Tropical Cyclone Maps — GFS, HWRF, GFDL, NOGAPS, ECMWF updated 4-times daily

GFS, HWRF, GFDL, ECMWF wind swath maps — 0 to 180 hour forecasts + model spaghetti and animations. — updated at least 4-times daily.

Maue also daily updates the climatological ACE and year-to-date for the global basins on his Tropical Page at FSU. While the Atlantic is heating up, with the GFS forecasting 3-hurricanes at once in the next 6-days to be happily spinning in the Central Atlantic, the seasonal ACE is struggling to keep up with climo (previous 30-year average).  The Western Pacific is at storm #6 (Mindulle) while Danielle is technically AL06 … and the ACE’s are roughly identical.  The climo ACE in the Western Pacific is 300% that of the North Atlantic — and 2010 is so-far shaping up to be a somewhat typical La Nina summer/fall.

” data-medium-file=”” data-large-file=”” class=”aligncenter size-large wp-image-23889″ src=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide09.png?w=500&h=375&#8243; alt=”” srcset=”https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/slide09.png?w=500&h=375&zoom=2 1.5x” scale=”1.5″ width=”500″ height=”375″>

Figure 9

The criteria for the temperature of years – ranging from warm red through to cold blu e- is shown in the legend heading the graphic. From this it can be seen that there were warm years, many moderate years, many cool years and many cold years, with the latter mostly being in the first two thirds of the period, the warm moderate years being well spread out (with a definite grouping around 1730 and especially at the end) and numerous cool ones, which again taper off towards the end. The suggested warmth at the (reconstructed) start around 1540 is tantalising and is better seen in context in Figure 6. This was said by some chroniclers to include the hottest and driest spring, then summer on record, followed by the warmest winter ever and an equally dry and hot spring and summer and autumn the following year.

The three years prior to this had also been exceptionally warm, as described in 6 of the Most Catastrophic Weather Events in British History.

What can we make of the overall extended historic picture when looking at the seasons and the individual years, augmented by the vast amount of literature and scientific studies, much of it referenced in the appendices of the articles cited above? It is that seasons, and no doubt very exceptional months, can affect the character of a year. That is to say, short periods of ‘weather’ are important in our understanding of the ‘climate’. The apparent deep freeze of the LIA from 1250 and lasting 500 years or more can be seen to be a chimera. Some winters were exceptionally cold but other seasons, and some winters, were as warm as their modern day counterparts.

There was no constant settled pattern but rather a mosaic of continually varying months, seasons and years, which at times produced a dominant theme, whether hot, cold, wet or dry, but was then replaced by another dominant theme that might be quite different. Whilst overall the cold might outweigh the warm, and this is especially so in some very defined periods, it was by no means a constant deep freeze, hence my use of the term ‘Intermittent Little Ice Age.’

What factors can dramatically affect the overall temperature record and the ‘climate’ over relatively short periods of months, a few seasons or a few years and thereby potentially shape our perceptions of an era? Two high profile possibilities are volcanic eruptions and sunspots;

Volcanic eruptions

The emissions can stay in the atmosphere blocking the sun which, depending on the season, may have a catastrophic impact in England or the near continent on the growing or harvesting of crops or vines, both of which have extensive centuries old records attached to them. In the case of crops, manorial records dating back to the 13th century are available and with grapes Le Roy Ladurie’s ‘Times of Feast, Times of Famine’ details the good and bad years dating back many centuries. These, amongst other records, can give a good indication of the likely real world impact of a major volcanic eruption, although its geographic location, prevailing winds and volume of emissions are key.

However, whilst undoubtedly a short term factor that can impact on temperatures of single months or even seasons, the longer term impact of volcanoes is perhaps exaggerated. As an example, the super volcano Mount Rinjani eruption -probably May to Oct 1257- was said by some scientists to have caused weather chaos for years around the world and even precipitated the first major phase of the LIA. [link]

However, detailed comments in Note 1 [Note 1], taken from contemporary English accounts, shows that this view is possibly misplaced:

Laki in Iceland erupted in June 1783 and continued sporadically until March 1784. [link]

There was a very hot summer in 1783 after some very mixed and often exceptionally wet weather in the preceding years and early snow in parts of the country. Then the annals of Exeter cathedral note:

1783 ‘Extra poor relief in extreme cold’

The grouping of cold seasons around that 1783 period appears to show emissions impacted on England for around a year or two, assuming these cold seasons were volcano related and not connected to what had caused the earlier unsettled weather. However, the decades before the eruption appear to show an unsettled period was already long established.

This is not to say that severe volcanic eruptions have no impact on weather, but that their impact may be overstated at times and such eruptions appear unlikely to have precipitated long term changes in the climate.

Sunspots

Sunspots are also often highlighted as prime causes of catastrophic changes in the climate that can cause a cold regime. Looking at CET there appears at first sight to be a reasonable correlation with the Maunder minimum around 1645 to about 1715 and the Dalton minimum around 1790 to 1830. However, an examination of the detailed record (see Figure 9) illustrates there were many warm seasons mixed in with the cold ones, so if sunspots did have an impact it was a sporadic one, or they were merely one of a number of possibly unrelated factors that affected the climate. Some very cold winters also often fall outside of known sunspot minima.

Other factors

Other factors that may influence the weather and climate to a greater or lesser degree include the strength and frequency of ocean events such as an El Nino or La Nina, the subsequent temperature of the oceans, strength of currents such as the ‘Gulf’ stream, Co2 levels, Cosmic rays, amount of sunlight, pollution and cloud cover, wind direction and perhaps extended periods of the chilling effects of a SSW (Sudden Stratospheric warming) possibly causing a break up of the polar vortex. So all in all there are a number of factors that shape our short term weather and may contribute towards longer term changes. Some, such as volcanoes and sunspots appear to probably have a passing and sporadic -although often very important- impact, rather than a long lasting one.

A SSW event can reverse the jet stream and in winter create intensely cold easterlies in contrast to the prevailing mild and wet westerlies in the UK. So in this scenario there are three broadly related factors; SSW’s , prevailing wind directions and the position of the jet stream, that are perhaps overlooked in their influence in shaping not only our weather but, over the longer term, the climate.

People have been studying the winds for years and there are numerous historic records concerning them. Information on the jet stream and SSW’s is mostly confined to more modern periods.

Anyone who has visited the exposed west coast of Britain will have seen the trees bent over in confirmation of the prevailing South westerly winds shown in the ‘wind rose’ (figure 10) taken at Chilthorne in Somerset in the West of England.

But what happens when those predominant ‘warm wet westerly winds’ stop blowing for a protracted time – for whatever reason – and are replaced by those from other directions? Could it cause a fundamental regime change in our climate – such as one of the intermittent periods of the LIA – that can be picked up in the records?

The possible impact of winds as a major factor in shaping the British weather and climate over the long and short term is the subject of part two of this study.

Figure 10

To summarise

The CET record demonstrates an interesting – but not climatically significant – decline since the turn of the century.

It also demonstrates that CET temperatures remain at a historically high level

A minority of countries or regions around the word have also experienced temperature declines of varying amounts and longevity, such as in America

The historic record appears to show evidence of enhanced urbanisation which may not be currently fully reflected in the appropriate CET adjustments by the Met office

There are potential historic siting concerns of one of the three stations generally used in CET although this station was removed several years ago.

The Met office appear likely to be releasing a new CET series that will account for some of these concerns

We can determine that the extreme seasons have lessened over the centuries, although that is partly an artefact of the rising temperature trend

We can see that exceptional seasons or months can affect the characteristics of a year or of a longer period

We can also see that the temperature has been generally rising throughout the official and extended CET record. If CET is an accurate global or Northern Hemisphere proxy (see Section 6 of the ‘Long Slow Thaw’) then it appears that we are experiencing a global warming trend of some centuries and the Global records from 1880 can be seen as a staging post and not the starting post for this rise.

We can determine that the Little Ice Age was rather intermittent, rather than continuous over hundreds of years and that individual factors such as volcanoes or sunspots do not always explain the marked changes in temperatures up or down.

Whether wind direction is a major factor in the intermittent Little Ice Age and in other periods through the CET will be the subject of a further paper.

CONTINUE READING –>

Advertisements