Maue: New Climate Hiatus or Accelerated Warming Trend Coming?

By Dr. Ryan Maue – Re-Blogged From http://www.WattsUpWithThat.com

You Ought to Have a Look: Time for a New “Hiatus” in Warming, or Time for an Accelerated Warming Trend?

As you can tell from our blog volume, there’s been a blizzard of new and significant climate findings being published in the refereed literature, and here’s some things You Ought to Have a Look at concerning the recent “hiatus” in warming and what might happen to our (now) post-El Niño climate.

With President Trump still deciding on U.S. participation in the Paris Climate Agreement, new research suggests the Earth’s global mean surface temperature (GMST) will blow past the so-called 1.5°C Paris target in the next decade. But before making that ominous prediction, Henley and King (2017) provide us with a good history lesson on a taboo topic in climate science circles: the recent global warming “hiatus” or “pause” from 1998-2014. One could be forgiven for thinking the hiatus was “settled science” since it featured prominently in the 2013 IPCC AR5 assessment report. But a concerted effort has been made in recent years to discount the hiatus as an insignificant statistical artifact perhaps based upon bad observational data, or a conspiracy theory to distract the public and climate policymakers. Even acknowledging the existence of the “hiatus” is sufficient to be labeled as a climate change denier.

Continue reading

Welcome to the New Era of Climate

By Josh – Re-Blogged From http://www.WattsUpWithThat.com

You’ve heard of the Holocene, and the Anthropocene…

The ‘Anthropocene‘ is a term widely used since its coining by Paul Crutzen and Eugene Stoermer in 2000 to denote the present time interval, in which many geologically significant conditions and processes are profoundly altered by human activities.

Well, hold onto your hats, er data.. Josh writes: Thanks to Robert B who thought up a great name for the era of climate science we are currently enduring…

Adjustocene_scr.jpg

– The Adjustocene, where no one will ever know what the temperature is.

CONTINUE READING –>

Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #198

The Week That Was: September 26, 2015 – Brought to You by www.SEPP.org

By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)

Changing Science: Several developments related to climate science occurred this week that can have some influence on policy as governments are rushing towards an “agreement” to be reached at the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties (COP-21) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to be held in Paris from November 30 to December 11. No doubt, these developments will be ignored by some governments, the government-supported Climate Establishment, which adheres to the findings of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) while ignoring its deficiencies, and by the well-funded Green lobby, which depends on an image of “saving the world.” One development is a book-length independent review of the IPCC’s work by Alan Longhurst, a biological oceanographer with over 50 years’ experience. The second development is group of essays by mathematician and electrical engineer David Evans posing a serious critique of the models depended upon by the IPCC and the Climate Establishment.

###################################################

Quote of the Week: “Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen.” Albert Einstein

################################################### Continue reading

Theory and the Global Warming Pause

cropped-bob-shapiro.jpg   By Bob Shapiro

Global temperature is an average of the daily high and the daily low (Tmax & Tmin). If only it were that simple.

There are very few official weather stations on land, and a laughably low coverage for the 3/4 of the earth’s surface covered by water. To make up for this lack of data, climatologists divvy up the earth’s surface into grid boxes (5 degrees X 5 degrees), and “infill” any (A LOT) of the missing data, using readings from stations up to 1200 Km away – that’s like filling in Kansas from a thermometer in Galveston, TX.

Climatologists also do “quality control” on the instrumental data to adjust for station moves or other perceived problems. You would think that all the adjustments pretty much would cancel each other out, but if you think that is what actually happens, then I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. The reality is that older data is adjusted downward while newer data gets adjusted upward – and the same data gets adjusted several times, always in the direction which would make the trend look to be more steeply warming.

Continue reading

Fiddling With Temperature Data is the Biggest Science Scandal Ever

By Christopher Booker – Re-Blogged From The Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk

New data shows that the “vanishing” of polar ice is not the result of runaway global warming

When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.

Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.

Continue reading

Forget Climategate: This ‘Global Warming’ Scandal is Much Bigger

By James Delingpole – Re-Blogged From http://www.breitbart.com

How can we believe in ‘global warming’ when the temperature records providing the ‘evidence’ for that warming cannot be trusted?

It’s a big question – and one which many people, even on the sceptical side of the argument, are reluctant to ask.

Continue reading

Adjustments & UHI Account for Most of the Rise in Temperatures

cropped-bob-shapiro.jpg  By Bob Shapiro

The temperature record using the 1221 “official” weather stations in the US Historical Climatology Network, are not useful in determining whether there is any danger of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW), that is man-made global warming. We already have seen that over 90% of these stations cannot measure more closely than the nearest degree Celsius. (In 70% of these stations, the expected error is greater than 2 degrees C.)

Continue reading